KOLLIEDVenture Builder

Thesis-fit ⟂0

Eligibility vs the studio thesis — a weighted Gate 0, then the verdict recorded on a signed DecisionReceipt.

T2T1
Gate-0 pass
55%
Eligible
8
Scoped
13

Set what fits the thesis

T1

Set sector, model, market and ambition against the studio thesis.

Dogfood-demo: Clearly-labelled dogfood demo: the 6 companies (MyStdy · Servicely · DifferenZ · Exponic · Digna · Kollied) are companies Espen holds a stake in, used ONLY as demo data to exercise the engines — never as proof that venture building works. Every demo row is flagged dogfood and held out of every client-facing aggregate (DEL 98-3).

Scope

Sector · model · market · ambition (demo: Digna).

SectorData governance / AI trust
ModelB2B SaaS · regulated sector
MarketNordics → EU (regulatory tailwind)
AmbitionStudio build → Scaleup handover

Gate 0 — weighted suitability

5 criteria × 0–5 × weight → 87/100. Bar: 65.

Σ 39 / 45

Legal-form suitability (pre-incorporation ok)
5×2=10
Stage fit (pre-seed/seed)
5×2=10
Geography fit (Nordics)
4×1=4
Ticket fit (studio band)
3×1=3
Thesis alignment (studio mandate)
4×3=12

Verdict — DecisionReceipt

Pass/fail + reason, signed (GATE0).

VerdictPASS — fits the studio thesisGate-0 score 87 ≥ 65
Signed byOwner — demoDecisionReceipt(GATE0) · who/when/verbatim
RationaleThesis-fit high; stage + geography within the mandate.

Suitability log

Read-only — no change expected here.

2026-06-18Scope saved
2026-06-19Gate 0 run → PASS
2026-06-19Verdict recorded to DecisionReceipt(GATE0)
Live commit · demo store